KEYWORD: Guideline G DIGEST: Applicant has failed to articulate a persuasive reason to change the Board’s resolution of this case. Adverse decision affirmed. CASENO: 06-25684.a2 DATE: 06/10/2008 DATE: June 10, 2008 In Re: ----------- Applicant for Security Clearance ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ISCR Case No. 06-25684 APPEAL BOARD DECISION ON APPLICANT’S REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION APPEARANCES FOR GOVERNMENT James B. Norman, Esq., Chief Department Counsel FOR APPLICANT Douglas J. Monaghan, Esq. 2 On March 21, 2008, the Board issued an Appeal Board Decision in this case. On April 14, 2008, Applicant submitted a request for reconsideration of this decision. Department Counsel submitted a response on April 17, 2008. The Board has inherent authority to entertain a request to reconsider its decisions. However, there is no right to reconsideration; the Board has the sole discretion to decide whether to exercise its inherent authority to reconsider one of its decisions. See ISCR Case No. 98-0621 at 1-2 (App. Bd. Nov. 23, 1999). Applicant requests that the Board reconsider its prior decision and grant him a security clearance, arguing that he had successfully mitigated the Guideline G security concerns in his case. In the alternative Applicant requests that the Board direct that the hearing be reopened so he can present additional evidence. The Board has considered Applicant’s brief and Department Counsel’s reply brief in light of our prior decision. Applicant has failed to articulate a persuasive reason to change the Board’s resolution of his case or to allow a reopening of the record. See ISCR Case No. 03-21012 at 1 (App. Bd. Sep. 20, 2005). Accordingly Applicant’s request is denied. Signed: Jeffrey D. Billett Jeffrey D. Billett Administrative Judge Member, Appeal Board Signed: William S. Fields William S. Fields Administrative Judge Member, Appeal Board Signed: James E. Moody James E. Moody Administrative Judge Member, Appeal Board