1 
 
                                                              
                        DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
         DEFENSE OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS 
           
             
 
 
In the matter of: ) 
 ) 
  )  ISCR Case No. 16-01883 
 ) 
Applicant for Security Clearance ) 
 
 
Appearances 
 
For Government: Jeff A. Nagel, Esq., Department Counsel 
For Applicant: Pro se 
 
 
 
______________ 
 
Decision 
______________ 
 
 
LOUGHRAN, Edward W., Administrative Judge: 
 
On August 29, 2016, the Department of Defense (DOD) issued a Statement of 
Reasons to Applicant detailing security concerns under Guideline F, financial 
considerations.1 Applicant responded to the SOR on October 7, 2016, and requested a 
hearing before an administrative judge. The case was assigned to me on June 5, 2017. 
The hearing was held as scheduled on July 19, 2017. On September 13, 2017, I 
proposed to the parties that this case was appropriate for a summary disposition in 
Applicant’s favor. Department Counsel did not object.  
 
Applicant served honorably in the U.S. military from 1985 to 1995. He received 
custody of his two children after his divorce in 2006. He had major surgery about four 
years ago. His ex-wife did not pay child support, but she claimed their children as 
dependents on her tax returns. Applicant delayed filing his federal tax returns for tax 
                                                          
1 This case is adjudicated under Executive Order (EO) 10865, Safeguarding Classified Information within 
Industry (February 20, 1960), as amended; DOD Directive 5220.6, Defense Industrial Personnel Security 
Clearance Review Program (January 2, 1992), as amended (Directive); and the adjudicative guidelines, 
which became effective on June 8, 2017. 
 
2 
 
years 2011 through 2013 while he obtained the documentation that would satisfy the 
IRS that he had the right to claim his children as dependents. 
 
Applicant filed his 2011 federal income tax return in April 2014; his 2012 return in 
February 2016; and his 2013 return in April 2016; all before the SOR was issued. His 
2014 through 2016 federal returns have all been filed. His returns indicate that he was 
due a refund every year with the exception of 2012, when he owed $717, which has 
been paid. 
 
In addition to his tax issues, the SOR alleges 22 medical debts totaling about 
$11,000 and 6 miscellaneous delinquent debts totaling about $7,000. Applicant had 
medical insurance during his surgery, but there were copayments and deductibles, and 
a number of bills were misdirected because of a bad address. He retained a company to 
assist him in paying or settling accounts, repairing his credit, and disputing inaccurate 
items on his credit report. Applicant has paid, settled, or otherwise resolved a majority of 
the debts in the SOR. He credibly testified that he will continue his efforts to resolve his 
financial problems. I am satisfied that he has a plan to resolve his financial problems, 
and that he has taken significant action to implement that plan. Based on the record 
evidence as a whole, I conclude that the security concerns are mitigated under the 
following mitigating conditions: AG ¶¶ 20(a), 20(b), 20(c), 20(d), 20(e), and 20(g).  
 
The concerns over Applicant’s history of financial problems do not create doubt 
about his current reliability, trustworthiness, good judgment, and ability to protect 
classified information. In reaching this conclusion, I weighed the evidence as a whole 
and considered if the favorable evidence outweighed the unfavorable evidence. I also 
gave due consideration to the whole-person concept. Accordingly, I conclude that he 
met his ultimate burden of persuasion to show that it is clearly consistent with the 
national interest to grant him eligibility for access to classified information. This case is 
decided for Applicant.  
 
 
 
________________________ 
Edward W. Loughran 
Administrative Judge